Created by nationally recognized data scientist, writer and thought leader John Tanner, the bravEd True Accountability™ Framework replaces outdated compliance-based school performance models, with a benefits-based approach that accounts for circumstances inside and outside of school that impact a child’s education. In Texas, the framework is being delivered as part of a statewide cohort experience. This two-year journey is designed to seamlessly “click in” to guide and inform the work districts and schools are doing locally to rethink school accountability.

As schools struggle to close achievement gaps forced wider by a global pandemic, educators desperately need a reliable system and process by which to accurately measure school performance. But traditional accountability measures are broken — and have been for years. The bravEd True Accountability™ Framework exposes and systematically removes inherent biases found in traditionally compliance-based school accountability frameworks in favor of a benefits-based approach, with focus on students and their future successes.

The True Accountability Framework™ includes a combination of guided and asynchronous professional learning opportunities, including scheduled strategic accountability conversations, a series of timed small-group workshops and optional office hours. Plus, 24/7 access to a growing knowledge base of school accountability resources. The process is designed to get educators talking about traditional accountability systems, to identify what’s working and what’s not, and develop a new, more holistic system to more accurately measure and reflect modern-day school performance at the local level.

The True Accountability™ Framework was designed specifically for school leaders and internal and external teams. District teams should include the district superintendent and two to three additional team members. Campus teams should include the building principal and two to three additional school-based team members.

The True Accountability™ Framework helps school leaders by exposing long-held biases in traditional K-12 accountability frameworks and providing an alternative, benefits-based system that better reflects the future needs and circumstances of individual students, parents and other stakeholders. Team members have an opportunity to learn about and embrace a mindset of True Accountability™, while workshopping problems of practice to implement a system that reflects the unique needs and challenges of their local communities.

bravEd’s True Accountability™ Framework cannot replace these largely compliance-based systems, but it can give you a parallel mindset and approach by which to be accountable to your stakeholder community by focusing on the evidence, benefits and forward-thinking school performance measures that they expect and that you need to make real improvements.

If you’re interested in bringing a system of True Accountability™ to your school or district, you can sign your team up today. Simply follow the button at the top or bottom of this page. Once you submit your information, you’ll receive a message to confirm your participation and detail next steps.

The movement began in earnest when John Tanner founded Test Sense (which is now bravEd) in 2009 as a vehicle for solving the the challenges associated with traditional school accountability. The goal was not to invent something new, but to observe how accountability works in a variety of organizations and draw out a set of frameworks that could be applied in schools. Schools and districts first started to take advantage of those frameworks in 2015, as part of a simple, grassroots approach. By late 2020, despite the challenges presented by a global pandemic, the number of districts across the country embracing these frameworks eclipsed 100, a watershed moment. BravEd anticipates a near doubling of districts engaging in this work next year and projects to replicate that growth over the next several years.

This is not a program, but the establishment of a set of frameworks, so it takes time. The entire process amounts to a two-year journey, but the frameworks produce impact right from the start. Your commitment to this cohort represents participation in Year 1 of the two-year program and includes a series of monthly team and weekly stakeholder engagements. Should you choose to continue with the program in Year 2, renewal pricing will be available to you.

School teams who participate in the True Accountability™ Framework will achieve at minimum, the following:

• The development of a True Accountability mindset among district staff/teams
• The establishment of a True Accountability system for each participating each school/district
• The capacity to aggregated their efforts, so that they are meaningful to policy makers and other stakeholders

Texas, Georgia, Mississippi and Pennsylvania have active consortia. Ohio is currently accepting enrollments, as is our first national cohort, representing a  half a dozen additional new states.

They already are. There is a general understanding in many states that current school accountability policies aren’t working. In Ohio, for example, the Secretary’s office and several state board members have asked to watch the process and learn from it. In Kentucky, grass-roots efforts like L3 and others are already garnering the attention of lawmakers. History shows that policy makers must answer two questions en route to effective policy: (1) where is a field or profession likely to have issues and (2) where do these issues currently exist? Schools have historically not been able to answer either question, resulting in an ineffective collection of policies. True Accountability aims to solve this problem for schools.

Our greatest mistake has been to complain in hopes that policy makers will opt to course correct, rather than to present policy-makers with workable alternatives. At bravEd, our theory is to build a better system first. Only then can the right policy approach be determined.

Immediately. The Accountability mindset, once established, creates a new way of seeing and understanding where a school is or is not effective. That information, which is not currently a part of any state accountability program, is the prerequisite to meaningful change and improvement.

We get this question a lot given the approach to accountability taken in schools, but it is the wrong question. In fact, schools are the only place, profession, or field that starts accountability by asking what they will measure, rather than what needs to be accomplished. True Accountability™ is rich in evidence, far more so than the manner in which current school accountability is done, but it begins every conversation with what needs to be accomplished.

Those other methods, quite frankly, are not accountability. Accountability is a high-stakes affair, and it should be, especially in something as important as schooling. Accountability effectively  indicate where a school is effective and where it is not yet as effective as it should be. That is truth, and only with truth can a school improve, and its stakeholders understand the nature of its efforts. Lists of data and/or accomplishments aren’t accountability because they fail to reach that standard.

To solve the school accountability challenge in a way that is meaningful to stakeholders, empowers educators, and creates the proper platform for effective educational policies.